|
Front Page » Archive » Vol
2 No 57 » here
Give credit its due
The March VanCity Credit Union board elections
could mark an historical watershed in the evolution of local
banking
by Donna Clark
The Republic
I have always banked at credit unions because of that vague
sense that they somehow give back to the community, and also
because they are small (read: warmer and fuzzier) than the big
banks. But until now I have taken little interest in the
election of directors.
This year's VanCity board elections, however, bring to
the fore big issues that go to the heart of what credit unions
are all about.
The Action Slate contesting this election was organized in
1985 in response to a perception that the management suite at
VanCity had gained control of the board at the expense of the
credit union's membership. The Action Slate was concerned
that the initial mission of VanCity was being taken over by
directors whose mission was more aligned with those of
traditional big banks.
The Action Slate established a set of directions that were
not simply profit-driven but also were crafted to serve the
community's interests. Now, for the first time since 1985,
the Action Slate's majority on the board is
threatened.
Between 1940 and 1980, Western Canadian communities made a
concerted effort to provide consumers and small businesses
basic financial services that were not being provided by banks
and trust companies with head offices in central Canada. In
1966, then-BC Premier WAC Bennett created the Bank of BC to
address this geographic economic disparity. After growing to
employ 1,410 workers and accumulating assets worth $2.7
billion, in 1993, the bank was dissolved into the Hong Kong and
Shanghai Bank, one of the 10 largest banks in the world. As a
result, credit unions have become the only BC-based financial
institutions, and BC credit unions have grown to control 20% of
the market.
BC credit unions gave workers personal credit, while
traditional banks were mostly interested in business loans that
served the commercial and mercantile class. Inside credit
unions, workers pooled their resources and lent each other
money. Hence, we have (or have had) the Fisherman's Credit
Union, the Police Credit Union, Teachers' Credit Union,
Street Railway Workers Credit Union, and Safeway Worker's
Credit Union, for example. An old joke was that if a
fire-fighter did not pay back his loan, his fellow workers
would hose him down.
Credit union members knew each other personally and were
beholden to each other. In the 1940s, credit unions emerged
which served cultural communities as well, including the
German, French, South Asian and Korean communities.
Until the 1970s, mortgage loans were still largely
central-Canadian based, and tightly controlled. During the
housing boom that followed the post-war baby boom, credit
unions grew fast because they began offering home mortgages.
Specifically, VanCity Credit Union grew dramatically by
offering mortgage loans to folks living east of Main
Street.
But traditional banks have been on the move as well. Over
the last 10 years, banks have taken over 85% of the securities
market. Of the four traditional pillars of the financial
services industries--banking, insurance, securities and
trusts--banks now dominate three, and are moving in on the
last one, insurance. We have, for example, The Scotia Bank,
which is now Scotia Bank and Trust, and the Bank of Montreal,
which has become the Bank of Montreal Nesbitt Burns.
The vast array of services offered by banks makes them a
one-stop financial shop. Credit unions are struggling to keep
up so they don't lose membership. Credit unions don't
want to send their members to banks for services they
can't provide.
Banks can economically provide all-in-one services because
of their sheer size. Banks can be $240 billion corporations
versus, for example, VanCity, which is an $8 billion credit
union. Banks are also able to put in place very costly internet
services and related information technology because costs can
be deferred throughout the corporation.
VanCity, as a community credit union, must try to stay
competitive with the banks, while at the same time trying to
stay true to their social responsibility mandate. One recent
problem VanCity has had to grapple with was how to provide VISA
services. Should VanCity contract VISA services through one of
the big banks? Or should VanCity develop a joint venture with
La Caisse Populaire (Quebec Credit Unions)? They eventually
chose the latter. The Quebec Credit Union system is the largest
in Canada, followed by BC.
With VanCity's present size--it's the largest
credit union in the country--it struggles to maintain its
direct connection to the community. VanCity has 40 branches
between Vancouver and Chilliwack, with more in Victoria and
Squamish. VanCity and credit unions in general have
historically managed to stay competitive by taking advantage of
the strength they derive from their direct connection to their
local communities.
The March board election is all about whether VanCity will
continue this tradition, or seek instead the strength derived
from becoming a big bank. Voter turnout by the membership is
crucial.
Front Page » Archive » Vol
2 No 57 » here
top of page
|